All who wish to continually improve their craft … never lose the need to be coached. ~ Art Costa & Bob Garmston
I was recently asked a question on Twitter: ‘Are some teachers un-mentorable?’ My response was along the lines of, ‘No-one is unmentorable or uncoachable; a person always has the capacity for growth.’ This belief underpins my ideas about school change and my school’s teacher growth model on which I presented at researchED conference in Sydney and ACEL in Melbourne.
In scholarly literatures, coaching (sometimes used interchangeable with the term ‘mentoring’, such as in the writings of Ellie Drago-Severson, who I talked with last year) seems to be divided into expert coaching and peer coaching.
Expert coaching involves an expert or master who provides guidance to a less-experienced apprentice. This includes Jim Knight’s instructional coaching in which the expert instructional coach provides judgements, feedback and suggestions, based on their expertise.
The other kind of coaching is peer or reciprocal coaching in which someone is paired with those of a similar level of expertise. These peers proceed to coach or mentor each other in a collaborative and non-hierarchical way. This approach, which is intended to develop a collaborative learning culture as well as the individual’s practice, includes models like instructional rounds, in which teachers form small professional learning groups which collectively work to enhance their practice.
Both coaching trends are based on use of data for growth (in a teaching sense, this would be some kind of classroom observation data) but are underpinned by different principles and beliefs. Expert coaching models assume that people learn best when someone with more knowledge and experience provides them with specific, targeted feedback for improvement, while the peer coaching models assumes that it is by working together that we can improve.
One form of coaching which can be conducted by a peer or an expert is Costa and Garmston’s Cognitive Coaching which is based in brain research like this which suggests that we are most likely to grow when we do thinking ourselves, rather than receive thoughts doled out by others. Cognitive Coaching focuses on developing individuals as self-directed learners who consciously reflect upon, conceptualise and apply understandings from one experience to the next. It is a data-based, non-judgemental, developmental and reflective model for conversations for planning, reflecting and problem resolving, as well as a tool for developing professional communities that value interdependence and individual capacity for self-directed learning.
The goal of Cognitive Coaching is the growth of individual and organisation through the development both of autonomy (of the individual) and interdependence (the development of a holonomous organisational culture in which individuals function as both autonomous, independent individuals and interdependent, responsive members of the larger system).
Unlike expert models of coaching which involve specific coach feedback, judgements and suggestions, Cognitive Coaching involves mediated processing. The Cognitive coach does not offer judgements, feedback or advice, but asks ‘artfully vague’ questions or presents impartial observational or other data, followed by silence, in order to encourage the cognitive and reflective processes of the teacher. There is certainly an art to the asking of well-crafted cognition-provoking questions, as I have found in my journey as a coach. This approach is intended to create personal change through new connections in the brain and reconstruct knowledge through a conscious, reflective approach to new experiences.
By avoiding positive and negative value judgements and opinion, by coaching ‘without manipulation,’ Cognitive Coaching aims to transform an individual’s beliefs about learning and refine their cognitive maps by encouraging them to talk and think about their decisions. In this way, talking aloud leads to examination and refinement of choices and behaviours.
The use of a Cognitive Coaching process for teacher learning and development is supported by Charlotte Danielson’s work (you can find my conversation with Charlotte here) in which she notes that mentors, supervisors, evaluators and colleagues should beware of imposing their own styles or preferences when observing. The question is not “Is this how I would do it?” but “Given the context, what is appropriate?” She also advises that classroom observations must be accompanied by conferences before and after observed lessons.
My own experiences as cognitive coach and coachee have shown me the power of this kind of coaching to allow people’s own internal resources to kick in to gear, their own passions and thinking to light up, and their confidence to solve their own problems and forge their own paths to soar. It has shown me the power of really being listened to and being given a safe, trusting place in which to verbally explore situations. It has also shown me that when you own your ‘a-ha’ moments, the learning sticks. Change happens. Practice shifts.
So, returning to the question of the uncoachable or unmentorable teacher, I wonder about the intent of the coaching or mentoring.
Cognitive Coaching aims to ‘convey a valued person from where they are, to where they want to be.’ There are some important assumptions being made here. The person is valued. They are assumed to be motivated and capable of reflection and growth. And they are helped on their learning journey to a destination to which they aspire. This model of coaching is not a deficiency model based on where the manager wishes the person would go or what an expert has identified as an area of growth. It is about the person. And. Where. THEY. Want. To. Go.
Do I believe that absolutely any teacher, any person, can be coached or mentored into professional growth? Absolutely.
We believe that all human beings are capable of change, that we continue to grow cognitively throughout our lifetime and that we all possess a vast reservoir of untapped potential. ~ Art Costa & Bob Garmston
Pingback: On teacher evaluation & the New York APPR reforms: a view from Down Under | the édu flâneuse
Pingback: Developing a Coaching Model: Choices & Considerations | Reflections on Teacher Professional Growth
Pingback: Can anyone be a coach? Selecting coaches for a school teacher growth model. | the édu flâneuse
Pingback: Choose your own Edventure: Letting genius blossom | the édu flâneuse
Pingback: Implementing a coaching model: One school’s approach | the édu flâneuse
I cannot tell how utterly awestruck I am reading your blog, especially your thoughts on education. It is very late (4 AM), yet I cannot put the laptop down. The eloquence and clarity with which you write is a breath of fresh air. Your words have energized me and inspired me. Talk about serendipity!
I am especially intrigued with the concept of cognitive coaching. I do not quite understand it yet, but from what I gather it is a model that encourages self-directed learning and community building. I have recently started my personal educational journey and would love to incorporate cognitive coaching into my framework. Like I have said, I don’t quite grasp the essence of it yet, but if it’s good enough to keep me awake till 4 AM there must be something to it.
Here is a quick introduction to my personal learning project, the Open Source Learning Project. I would be honored if you could give me any feedback or suggestions on how it could be improved or modified. We are all in this journey together. Greetings from Mexico!!
Wow, Luis, thank you for your wonderful comment!
Your learning project looks interesting. If you are interested in cognitive coaching and don’t want to do the course, you can get the texts: http://www.thinkingcollaborative.com/product-category/cognitive-coaching/ .
Best of luck!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Coaching: My state of play ~ #educoachOC | the édu flâneuse
Pingback: Teacher efficacy, agency & leadership #aera16 | the édu flâneuse
Pingback: Reflections on coaching after ISCAPPED 2016 | the édu flâneuse
Pingback: Guest Post from Deborah Netolicky. Heutagogical and transformational: Journeys of discovery, discomfort and breakthrough | Heutagogy Community of Practice